PHOTO GALLERY


George Curry Today is July 25th, 2008|Hudson Valley Press - News for NY's Hudson Valley|Bookmark HVPress!



January 23rd, 2008

“Billary” is playing the race card



After Hillary Clinton fell off of her white horse with a third-place finish in Iowa and by barely edging Barack Obama in New Hampshire despite a 17-point lead just two weeks before the election, "Billary" Clinton are playing the race card by unfairly accusing Obama of injecting race into the presidential contest.

Billary - Bill and Hillary - have forcefully attacked Obama after his victory in Iowa, a state that is 94.6 percent White and New Hampshire, with a population that is 95.8 percent White. Heading into the South Carolina primary, they accuse him of playing the race card by exploiting an insensitive remark Hillary uttered about Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

In an interview, the former First Lady said, "Dr. King’s dream began to be realized when President Johnson passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964…It took a president to get it done."

Bill Clinton attempted to engage in damage control by calling Black radio talk shows, including one hosted by Al Sharpton, to contend that his wife’s comments were taken out of context. Hillary, in an interview on NBC’s "Meet the Press," said, "This is an unfortunate story line that the Obama campaign has pushed very successfully. I don’t think this campaign is about gender, and I sure hope it’s not about race."

A White presidential contender, John Edwards, also criticized Hillary.

"I must say I was troubled recently to see a suggestion that real change came not through the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, but through a Washington politician. I fundamentally disagree with that," the former senator from North Carolina said at a Baptist church in Sumter, S.C.

Because he disagreed with Hillary, does that mean that somehow Edwards also injected race into the campaign?

The New York Times

obviously doesn’t think so. In an editorial, the newspaper said Hillary "Came Perilously Close to Injecting Racial Tension" into the contest. It stated, "Why Mrs. Clinton would compare herself to Mr. Johnson, who escalated the war in Vietnam into a generational disaster, was baffling enough. It was hard to escape the distasteful implication that a black man needed the help of a white man to effect change."

Hillary Clinton understated the contributions of Dr. King and now she and her high-profile surrogates are trying to blame Obama for her mistake. The candidate has dismissed Hillary’s accusation as "ludicrous."

Bill Clinton didn’t make matters better by referring to Obama in "fairy tale" terms. He would later declare that he was referencing Obama’s position on the war in Iraq. But Michelle Obama, the candidate’s wife, doesn’t see it that way.

In a visit to the state in November, she made it clear that in contrast to Hillary Clinton’s upper class background, her husband has lived anything but a fairy tale life.

"Dream of a president who was raised like Barack was by a single mom who had to work and go to school and raise her kids and accept food stamps once in a while," she said. "Imagine a president who knows what that’s like."

It is no accident that as we move closer to February 5th, when voters in 22 states will cast their ballots in primaries and caucuses, that the Black vote will take center stage in the Democratic contests.

According to the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, Blacks make up 56 percent of the Democratic electorate in Mississippi, 47 percent in South Carolina and Georgia, 35 percent in Maryland, 33 percent in Virginia, 23 percent in Tennessee, 20 percent in New York, 15 percent in Missouri and 14 percent in Ohio.

In fact, with its January 26th voting, South Carolina becomes the first state to showcase the Black vote and an Obama victory there would force Clinton to have a strong showing on Super Tuesday or fold her tent. That’s why she’s racing to play the race card.

If the polls are accurate - and after New Hampshire, no one can count on that anymore-Hillary Clinton might be headed for a loss in South Carolina.

A poll released Sunday by the Public Policy Polling in Raleigh, N.C. shows Obama holding a 42-37 lead over Clinton among likely Democratic voters, followed by South Carolina-born Edwards with 16 percent. In a key finding, Obama has overtaken Clinton among Black voters and now holds a 68 percent to 19 percent lead, with Edwards getting only 4 percent.

Hillary Clinton can only beat Obama is if she can persuade Democratic voters that he is unelectable or somehow she is more deserving because of her last name. At the ballot box, Obama is dispelling both myths and it is therefore no wonder that Hillary Clinton is having to play the race card and have her husband pretend he is running for a third term.

4.5 / 5 (6 Votes)

Copyright 2006-2008 The Hudson Valley Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Reader Response
  • Marie
  • January 24th, 2008 Obamas has been crying since he lost every primary since Iowa, where 17yr olds (who can’t vote in general election) and Bill Richardson supporters put him over the top, otherwise he would have lost there too. The media has told the country that SC is a racist black only vote. So why would anyone other than the only 1/2 black candidate stay there. John Edwards is wasting his time in SC per the media. I don't think that ALL SC voters are as racist and naive as the media wants to portray them. It’s an attempt to help Obama because his camp has made fools of the media. It took voters and an ex-president to bring his terrible senate record, Bush/Chaney backing, republican loving, lack of good judgment and inexperience out in the open when the media tried to hide it. Frankly we are tired of Obama crying! If he crashes so quickly because he’s getting caught with corrupt campaigning funds with Rezko etc… what would he do when foreign leaders come at him? Run crying too, or call Oprah for help? …Just what we cannot afford to take a chance on. Giving pre-written church speeches does not make a President. And having his wife, Michelle Obama stumping throwing out racial comments is disgusting! No one sees her as first lady material; we don’t even see her as a lady! No one was crying when Obama camp was attacking Hillary? And ALL the media treating her unfairly. She has proven that she is a strong leader after all the attacks she has endured and over come. Thank God the voters are smarter than the media and Obama give them credit for. DONT WASTE VOTES ON OBAMAS, WE DONT NEED A RACIST IN THE WHITE HOUSE

    Reader Response
  • Robert Campbell
  • January 23rd, 2008 A dynasty was good for J. R. Ewing, but they have not been so good for the people of The U.S.A. The Bush presidency is testimony to that.

    The Clintons' experience would be valuable in the vice presidency or in the cabinet.

    But we need a president who can inspire and lead.

    We do not need a disbarred attorney and spouse of a nominee to create ill will in our own party.

    We do not need to be patronized and treated as though voters are interfering with some preconceived dynastic plan.

    In ancient cultures there may have been a belief in the divine right of kings (or queens), but in modern America, there is no belief in the divine right of Bubba.

    :-)

    Vote with your heart and don't be condescended to.

                  Let Your Voice Be Heard ... Fill Out the Reader Response Form Below
    Your name:
    Your email:
    Article Title:
    Comment Text:


    *Posts do not appear immediately

    digg it MyWeb Google
    Slashdot del.icio.us Technorati
     



    Google

    Should the government rescue mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?
    Yes
    No









     

    HEADLINES



    HVPress.net | Copyright © 2006-2008 Hudson Valley Press. All rights reserved. | Use of this site indicates your agreement to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy for our Site. | HVPress.net